|
|
|
A little bit pregnant It is but a pedestrian Open Pairs in a Regional, but the roots of this particular tree reach very far. The opponents coming to the table look very husband-and-wifey and the slight accent in their greeting is frenchy. They could be that famous pair from Canada (oh God, what is their name) or fugitive snowbird "C" players from the Saturday afternoon club game, next town. This brings up a concept, that has nothing to do with this hand-of-the-month. A well known around-the-World International Expertess (P.C. squared) has vehemently advocated, that all participants in serious (i.e.: not club) pair-tournaments wear a badge (tasteful jewelry of course) identifying their standing as a player; in the US. of A. probably masterpoint totals, other classification elsewhere. The purpose of the badge (our W.I.E. claimed) is to remove the blind lottery aspect of knowing or not knowing the quality of the opposition. It is bad enough to be a random victim (or winner) of which opponent
gets the 6NT hand cold on a delayed duck double squeeze (thus getting a +100 top or a
-1440 bottom completely unrelated to your pair's skills), but having to guess on a 1- ... Zero tolerance is great, but in practice, when
the bidding went 1-
Back to the Gallic opponents (quality still unknown). White-against-white, Monsieur opens 1-NT; 15-17 range announced ... ... by the way, do you know why this announcement requirement? It is widely believed,
that the ACBL instituted it in response to the "cute"(!) idea of
some people; player behind the NoTrump-er asking the range shows, by that
question, a holding of 8-11 points or whatever count suits them. We
refuse to punish the burglars, allow convicted cheaters to play, thus we remove the Jimmying Tool
instead. Partner doubles the NT, showing both Majors or one Minor, (you alert), Madame bids 2-
do you (you'll be damned if you do, doomed if you dont)
X and may find yourself -180 or worse, when it was a diamond suit; partner has no idea how good your diamonds are, anyway you must have taken long enough time, to prevent him from "taking it out" (see above); Ask, but you are now a little bit pregnant. The little dot is neither white nor blue: you had a right to ask, but the very act of asking (showing both "cards" and Diamonds) sentences you to be wrong. The director, when called, will sympathize, but find you guilty, if your side lands on their collective feet. You are slightly less guilty, than the cutesy-poo asking the NT range, but only slightly. Pass and throw the dice. If Madame had truly diamonds, it will go all pass. Her score is likely to be better, than the black suit part score your side is entitled to. Would Monsieur accept the transfer he failed to announce and it comes back to you, it is guessing time: if partner had one minor, we should be there (thus bid 2NT), if both Majors, we want to be in spades or defend, depending on the quality of his hearts (thus double, hoping that partner works it out, which is a bad gamble by itself). Doomed either way to the flip of the proverbial coin. One ray of sunshine (and that is
the true reason for the entire philippic herein, conveying a little
known twist in the rules for rulings) falls on the most likely scenario: if it was a
transfer, opener will bid 2- ... if it was diamonds, the sun is in
the clouds, no 2- Would you be incensed enough by
the preceding to express an opinion, please E-Mail to
Road to Home NewsLetter Hand O"Month Grimoire More Advice
Visitors:
Control: 0110:728;0217:1120;0351:0323;0399:0618;0416:0711;0429:0721;0437:0805;0878:0991 |